Cassandra Had Joint Pain Too

What to do when your doctor doesn’t believe you
By Wren · August 11, 2026

Who was Cassandra? The short version, for anyone who wants it.

Cassandra knew things nobody believed. She stood in the middle of Troy and told anyone who would listen exactly what was coming, and they smiled politely and went back to their business. She wasn’t wrong. She was just a woman with information nobody wanted to receive.

She would have recognised the GP’s waiting room immediately.


The aching started young. Not dramatically, not in a way that made anyone reach for a clipboard. Just a persistent, low-grade wrongness in joints that should have been fine, in a body that was otherwise healthy and young enough that the obvious explanation was anxiety, growing pains, attention-seeking, or some combination of the three depending on which doctor was having the conversation.

This went on for a long time.


What Medicine Did With Women’s Pain

For most of modern medical research, the default human body in clinical studies was male. Women were formally excluded from clinical trials from the 1970s onwards — the FDA actually codified this in 1977 — on the basis that fluctuating hormone levels made female bodies too complex to study cleanly. It wasn’t until 1993 that US legislation mandated women be included in clinical research at all. ¹ The result is a body of medical knowledge built substantially on male physiology, applied to everyone.

Women wait longer in emergency departments for pain relief. Women are more likely to have their pain attributed to psychological causes. Women are more likely to be told to lose weight, manage stress, or come back if it gets worse. ²

Cassandra was not imagining it. Neither were you.


The Diagnosis That Arrived Late

Minor hypermobility is one of those things that exists on a spectrum wide enough to be easily dismissed at the lower end. Joints that move a little further than they should, that ache in ways that seem disproportionate to the activity, that never quite settle. Not dramatic enough to trigger alarm. Not nothing.

By the time a diagnosis arrived, the problem had been present for decades. The diagnosis didn’t change the pain. It just meant someone finally wrote it down.

What changed in my 40s wasn’t the pain. It was that doctors stopped looking through me when I described it. The symptom hadn’t changed. My age had. Something about crossing a certain threshold made the same words, said by the same person, land differently in the room.

That’s not medicine working. That’s medicine catching up.


What To Do When You’re Not Being Heard

This is the part Cassandra didn’t have and you do.

Document everything. Dates, symptoms, severity, what makes it better or worse. A pain diary is dull to keep and useful to have. It turns “I’ve been saying this for years” into a piece of paper that says the same thing, which is apparently more persuasive.

Use the language of function not feeling. “My joints ache” is easy to dismiss. “I can’t open jars, I can’t walk up stairs without pain, I missed three days of work last month” is harder to wave away. Describe what you can’t do, not just how you feel.

Ask for a referral, specifically. “I’d like a referral to a rheumatologist” is harder to decline than “do you think I need to see someone?” Name the specialist. Make it a specific request.

Take someone with you. Research on gender bias in pain assessment consistently finds that women are taken more seriously when someone else is in the room corroborating the account. It shouldn’t matter. It does. ³

Find a different doctor if you need to. This is the one nobody says out loud. You are allowed to leave a practice that isn’t hearing you. It is not dramatic and it is not rude. It is a reasonable response to not receiving adequate care.


The Vindication

Being believed, after a long time of not being believed, is its own kind of thing. Not triumphant exactly. More like the quiet satisfaction of someone finally reading the report you wrote three years ago and saying, oh, you were right.

The women before us went largely undiagnosed, undertreated, and told to come back if it gets worse. A lot of them didn’t go back. A lot of them just got on with it, quietly, because that was the only option available.

Medicine is finally, belatedly, starting to study female bodies as female bodies rather than as a variation on the default. Research specifically on women’s pain, women’s inflammation, women’s hormonal influence on chronic conditions is growing. It’s slow and it’s late and there is still a long way to go, but it is moving. ⁴

You are living in the window where it’s moving. Which means you don’t have to accept what the women before you were handed. You can push for the referral, find the doctor who listens, ask for the investigation, try the thing that makes sense to your body even if nobody prescribed it.

Cassandra was right all along. The difference is you have options she didn’t.


¹ Women were formally excluded from many clinical trials from the 1970s, with the FDA recommending exclusion of women of reproductive age in 1977. The reasoning was that hormonal fluctuation would complicate data — a belief now recognised as unfounded. It wasn’t until 1993 that the NIH mandated inclusion of women in clinical research. Healthline and the AAMC both cover the history clearly.

² Gender bias in pain assessment is well documented across emergency medicine and general practice. Healthline covers the research accessibly and references primary sources.

³ Research on gender bias in clinical settings and the effect of having an advocate present is summarised in this overview from the BMJ.

⁴ Research on sex and gender differences in pain processing, inflammation, and treatment response is an actively growing field. The Conversation has a clear overview of where the science currently stands.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top